Pigmented Lesion Assay Publications

DermTech Melanoma Test

PLA Publications

JCAD: Genomic Evaluation of Clinically Ambiguous Pigmented Lesions

The clinical evaluation of pigmented lesions represents a ‘high-stakes’ scenario as a missed melanoma can be fatal. Traditional clinical assessment visually sorts pigmented lesions into those that merit a biopsy and those that do not. In our practice there exists a group of lesions judged to not merit biopsy where melanoma, while very unlikely, cannot be excluded with absolute certainty.

read more

Concordance of Preferentially Expressed Antigen in Melanoma by Non-Invasively Collected Polymerase Chain Reaction and Immunohistochemistry on Paraffin Embedded Tissue

There is a higher concordance with PCR when PRAME is positive by IHC than when it is negative by IHC. When PRAME is positive by IHC, it is usually also positive by PCR (87.5% concordance in this analysis). In contrast, the concordance rate when PRAME is negative by IHC is 54.8%. This suggests the DMT frequently detects PRAME expression that is below the level detectable by IHC.This difference in concordance rates maybe explained by the higher sensitivity of PCR compared to IHC.

read more

SKIN: Cost-Benefit Analysis of the Pigmented Lesion Assay When Introduced Into the Visual Assessment / Histopathology Pathway for Lesions Clinically Suspicious for Melanoma

The OptumInsights study demonstrates the economic value of the DermTech® Pigmented Lesion Assay (PLA) in the assessment of uncertain pigmented lesions to rule out melanoma. When the DermTech PLA is introduced into the current care pathway to guide pigmented lesion management decisions, the Optum model demonstrates $5.66 million in net savings, for a plan of 1 million commercial members.

read more

SKIN: Non-Invasive Detection of Genomic Atypia Increases Real-World NPV and PPV of the Melanoma Diagnostic Pathway and Reduces Biopsy Burden

Management of pigmented lesions currently relies on visual assessment with surgical biopsy and histopathologic examination for those lesions suspicious for melanoma. A non-invasive genomic assay that detects two melanoma-associated biomarkers (PLA, 2-GEP) has recently been validated as an adjunct to visual assessment for distinguishing high-risk pigmented lesions appropriate for biopsy from those that can be safely monitored via clinical surveillance.

read more

Long-term outcome of pigmented lesions clinically suspicious for melanoma previously tested with the Pigmented Lesion Assay (PLA): results from the TRUST Study

The assessment of pigmented lesions suspicious for melanoma remains a challenge. The non-invasive Pigmented Lesion Assay (PLA) guides biopsy decisions and detects melanoma at its earliest stages based on genomic atypia. The TRUST Study was designed to determine the proportion of true negative lesions among those that initially tested negative. Of the 1781 lesions in the long-term follow-up screening cohort, there were no known melanoma deaths or late-stage melanoma detected.

read more

SKIN: Genomic Atypia to Enrich Melanoma Positivity in Biopsied Lesions: Gene Expression and Pathology Findings From a Large U.S. Registry Study

Importance: Melanoma is diagnosed in approximately 200,000 people within the US each year and is responsible for more than 6,850 deaths. Currently, clinical suspicion guides biopsy decisions and melanoma is confirmed in approximately 4% of biopsied lesions. A non-invasive two-gene expression test (2-GEP) was shown to enhance the physical exam by evaluating genomic atypia to guide biopsy decisions. This study examines the corresponding histopathology of real-world 2-GEP-positive cases.

read more

SKIN: Caring for Melanoma Survivors with Self-Detected Concerning Moles During COVID-19 Restricted Physician Access: a Cohort Study

Background: Physician appointments for non-essential care ceased during COVID-19. Objective: To pilot test a telehealth solution for patients to rule out melanomas and need for surgical biopsies based on genomic analyses of pigmented lesion samples obtained via adhesive patches. Methods: Surveys assessed SSE anxiety. Under remote clinician guidance, patients or partners obtained samples using adhesive patches (DermTech, La Jolla, CA). Results: SSE anxiety increased. Guided self-sampling led to molecular risk factor analyses in 7/7 (100%) of cases compared to 9/10 (90%) randomly selected physician-sampled control cases. Conclusions: Adhesive patch self-sampling under remote physician guidance is a viable specimen collection option.

read more